---

 

CLICK HERE TO PHONE BANK FROM HOME!

---

OUR FIVE CORE PRINCIPLES:

Limited Government

Fiscal Responsibility

Personal Responsibility

The Rule of Law

National Sovereignty

 

 

« Atlas Shrugged - Special Sc... | Front page | Early Voting Begins Monday!... »

 

There is a whole lot of discussion going on about the redistricting maps out there, and things are moving so fast, it's nearly impossible to keep up.  We thought it helpful, however, to lay out the facts as they stand today.

 

There is plenty being written about the various proposals and their effects statewide.  This write-up is focused on the proposals as they affect Dallas County.

 

For starters, here is the current map of State House Districts for Dallas County (click image to zoom):

 

 

(All maps in this write-up generated at http://gis1.tlc.state.tx.us/ )

 

Under the current map, there are 16 State House districts.  Prior to the 2010 election, 10 of the 16 districts in Dallas County were represented by Democrats and 6 districts were represented by Republicans.  In the wake of the 2010 election, 10 of the 16 districts are represented by Republicans and 6 of the districts are represented by Democrats.  At least five of the districts can readily be described as "swing districts."  These five "swing districts" are the following:

 

HD 101 (Mesquite--presently represented by Cindy Burkett, swung in 2010)

HD 102 (North Dallas--presently represented by Stefani Carter, swung in 2010)

HD 105 (Irving--presently represented by Linda Harper-Brown, nearly swung in 2008)

HD 106 (Grand Prairie--presently represented by Rodney Anderson, swung in 2010)

HD 107 (Lakewood/Lake Highlands--presently represented by Kenneth Sheets, swung in 2010)

 

2000-2010 DEMOGRAPHIC SHIFTS

 

Between 2000 and 2010, Dallas County saw a net gain in population overall, but it saw a proportional loss as compared to the rest of Texas.  As a result of this proportional loss, Dallas County is losing two House District seats, for a net of 14 seats after redistricting.  Further, much of the population gain in Dallas County has taken place in the southern, Democrat-leaning portions of the County.  Thus, however the districts are drawn, the overall makeup of Dallas County is going to be more favorable to Democrats than it was previously.

 

It is within this context that the proposed districts have been drawn.

 

 

THE SOLOMONS MAP

 

The House Leadership is promoting a map--generally referred to as 'The Solomons Map'--that makes a number of substantial changes in Dallas County.  Most notably, the Solomons Map:

 

Rolls much of current House District 101 (Mesquite, represented by freshman Republican Cindy Burkett) into District 107 (represented by freshman Kenneth Sheets) and District 113 (represented by Joe Driver).

 

Rolls much of current House District 106 (Grand Prairie, represented by freshman Republican Rodney Anderson) into House District 105 (represented by Linda-Harper Brown).

 

Here is the Dallas County portion of the Solomons Map (click image to zoom):

 

 

Statewide, the Solomons Map is drawing much derision for the manner in which certain favored representatives and candidates are benefitted and certain representatives are punished.  It appears that the criticisms of the rural portions of the Solomons Map are well-deserved.  The Dallas County portion of the Solomons Map, however, seems to be drawn in a fairly reasonable manner.

 

 

THE NIXON MAP:

 

A group of conservative legislators are backing an alternate map drawn up by former State Representative Joe Nixon and generally referred to as 'The Nixon Map.'  There appears to be significant consensus that the Nixon Map corrects a great deal of the rural ridiculousness of the Solomons Map.

 

Within Dallas County, the Nixon Map proposes a number of changes, most notably:

 

Current House District 107 (represented by freshman Republican Kenneth Sheets, Lakewood/Lake Highlands) is broken up into multiple pieces, which are appended to House Districts 100, 102, 108, 113 and 114.  The largest piece is appended to House District 102 (represented by freshman Stefani Carter, North Dallas)

 

Current House District 106 (represented by freshman Republican Rodney Anderson, Grand Prairie) is carved into multiple pieces, which are appended onto House Districts 103, 104, 105, 109 and 111.

 

The full map of the Dallas County portion of the Nixon Map is here (click image to zoom):

 

 

As noted, the rural portions of the Nixon Map are considered by many to be preferable to the Solomons Map. The Dallas County portion of the Nixon Map, however, is problematic:  Of course, the demographics of Dallas County likely make it nearly inevitable that two pairs of Republicans will be paired up.  Thus, it becomes a question, as it often does, of "whose ox is gored."

 

Under the Solomons Map, the oxen of Straus supporters Linda Harper-Brown (105) and Joe Driver (113) are gored a bit--though both retain their districts, in modified form.  Freshmen Cindy Burkett (101) and Rodney Anderson (106) see the bulk of their districts absorbed into districts 113 and 105, respectively--thus placing each in a fairly competitive position against Driver and Harper-Brown, respectively.

 

Under the Nixon Map, the ox of conservative freshman Kenneth Sheets is gored quite a bit, though Sheets retains the option of challenging fellow freshman Stefani Carter to represent District 102.  The ox of conservative freshman Rodney Anderson is thoroughly gored--then shot and buried upside down in a shallow grave (metaphorically speaking).

 

Statewide, more than a few conservatives are lining up behind the Nixon Map, while certain activists are advocating for a hybrid map combining the urban portions of the Solomons Map with the rural portions of the Nixon Map.  The proponents of the hybrid map argue that it is counterproductive for reformers to hamstring two newly-elected conservatives (Sheets and Anderson) who stood with the conservatives in the Republican Caucus in order to protect the seats of two longtime incumbents (Driver and Harper-Brown) who stood against the conservatives in January.

 

Your thoughts?  Please weigh in below.

 

by Tom Weatherred  2011-04-23 17:07:20
It would appear that the hybrid map would be preferable. However, when the conservatives allowed Straus to be re-elected speaker, we probably lost the war and will end up with more Democrats than we should have.
by Christy  2011-07-22 13:02:13
Democrat Debbie Wasserman-Shultz and her gang of dispicable liberal haggetts tries to verbally lynch African-American representative Alen West who served in the military with honors.
by  raymyers24  2011-04-23 17:41:45
Upon discussion with one of the legislatures involved (dramaticly
involved) I conclude that we wait until Tuesday morning. I will receive information relevant to additional tweaks on the Nixon Plan by then. Let's not cannibalize ourself through overreaction.
Ray Myers
by Christy  2011-07-22 13:15:40
Americans do not like secret meetings that result in backdoor deals. People do not like finding out what is really in a legislation until after it is passed. That is what is going on now with these Obama/RINO deals floating around in an atttempt to undermine the efforts of Cut/Cap/Balance.

Conservative Pete Sessions was interviewed on Mark Levin (the real veteran of the Ronald Reagan aadministration) and Pete Sessions said he reived a pathetic handout. They are not even real plans.

Basically these are tax and spend proposals that promise sketchy promises of future spending cuts with nothing really substantian to eliminate the need to raise the debt ceiling now.

Pete Sessions supports Cut/Cap/Balance because it would eliminate the need to raise the debt ceiling now, has provisions to prevent liberals from using it as an excuse to raise taxes, cuts a substatntial amount of spending now, and does not raise taxes.

Also these deals are probably unconstitutional a
by Michael Wilhite  2011-04-23 17:47:37
I would like to see absolutely no gerrymandering of districts. I would divide Dallas County along either lattitude or longitude into the number of districts. Each representative would be responsible to a slice of Dallas County. Some slices would be more populated than others. Longitudinal slices, for example, would have representatives working for both the Park Cities and South Oak Cliff. Ideally, all 254 counties would be done the same way. I think this would eliminate special interests, for the most part. A representative truly would have to represent his entire district, no matter their race or socio-economic standing.
by curtmilr  2011-04-23 18:00:33
All districts should be created based solely on two criteria: equal population and tightly contiguous area defined by natural barriers, i.e., rivers, railroads, freeways, and jurisdictional boundaries to the extent possible. (Smaller towns should not be subdivided.) (Racial representation would occur naturally due to natural housing patterns.) There should be ZERO consideration for incumbents, as the purpose is citizen representation not protection of incumbents!
by Wes McClure  2011-04-24 08:11:04
I disagree with straight line slices because boundaries like cities & school districts are very real. I do not like the Solomon's map because it seems to disregard several Cities, esp. Mesquite, while the Nixon map comes closer to retaining those logical boundaries.
by Larry Collins  2011-04-23 21:41:34
I hope Stefani Carter's district is absorbed by some TRUE conservative and not a RHINO. I intend to oppose her as strongly as I opposed Carol Kent. Whatever it takes to defeat her is FINE WITH ME.
by linda Patterson  2011-04-23 22:01:38
I believe I will need a lot more understanding of how this really effect the conservative voter. I am not as up to date on how our system works.
by  anonymous (BFE)  2011-04-23 22:42:32
100% I support the candidates who stood with the conservative caucus. I am really tired of individuals who call themselves conservative until it is time to vote!!!! Being a long time incumbent is not the deciding factor, but in fact, it is the strength of their conservative vote that is critical to the caucus.
by Jim Spell  2011-04-24 20:21:00
I would favor the hybrid map for the reasons stated above.
by Jeanne Jacobs  2011-04-25 05:29:25
If benefits are given, none should be given o those who voted against the consertativesl I agree with the 2 criteria of equal population and tightly contingousarea defined b natural boundaries. I fully support zero consideration for incumbents since the purpose is to reprosent constituents, not incumbents.Elimination of special interests and RINOs, as much as possible, would be my preference.
by Bill Thoreson  2011-04-25 10:54:28
It isn't about the representatives. It is about how to elect conservative majorities.
by  jweaver  2011-04-25 19:07:56
Things are still to uncertain to make an intellegent comment, things will change in a week, repost the question next week.
by Gary Good  2011-04-25 23:03:50
At this time in the process, I prefer the hybrid map -
by Rebecca  2011-04-26 10:06:57
I like the solomons map because i do not think dallas county should be weakened. i also believe all of our state representatives are doing a great job and do not want to lose any of them. from what i can tell, the nixon map creates carter's district into a democratic district so we would lose her and sheets and one or two others. i do not think that is fair or right. i do see carter is supporting the same legislation as the others so they all appear good. i hate that stephani supported the speaker but i think she has done a good job overall. i wish dallas did not have to lose two republicans. i do think it is impossible to maintain 101 republicans across texas but their Districts should not be 50% swing districts overall. BAD IDEA~
by John Fox  2011-04-26 21:46:39
Protect the newly elected conservatives. We have got to start somewhere to rebuild the Republican party into some thing that at leasts represents tax paying citizens.
by Corinne Smith  2011-04-27 09:50:42
Joe Driver can go from # 113. He accepted a pledge card and at least 80,000 from Joe Strauss. The Tea party members had an appointment with him to share information and graphs for Ken Paxton. He wouldn't budge, or even consider a change in his vote because of the favorable backing of Joe Strauss. He says he is a man of faith and a family man, yet Strauss supports many abortions bills etc., He is a contradiction to his principles, and plays the political games. That is just one example from our meeting. There were other points also. While he is a strong supporter of the second amendment,( right to bear arms), and sits on the Tx Homeland Security & Public Safety, I am concerned he will look out for his own " Power " retention. I would take proven Cindy Burkett any day. She is stable, stands for her principles, fights for the people, and will offer us a much better outcome for the future, including fiscal matters. She will be truly concerned for the State of Texas . :-)
by richardson beard  2011-05-03 12:19:03
Stefani Carter made a deal with Joe Straus to support him for Speaker if she were elected. She admitted this to her supporters after the election, stated when asked that there was no consideration extended for her pledge to Straus, yet was unwilling or unable to answer the question as to why she determined she was bound by a pledge for which there was no exchange. I for one would be happy to support any conservative who opposes her and feel that she is less than forthright. I support the Nixon map.
« Atlas Shrugged - Special Sc... | Front page | Early Voting Begins Monday!... »